The unfolding diplomatic dispute between Ukraine and Poland has caught the attention of the whole world. It started when Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky named one of the units of the Ukrainian armed forces ‘Heroes of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UIA)’ – which is basically the same thing as naming it ‘Heroes of Nazi collaborators’.
The term ‘heroes of…’ is an important element of the Ukrainian cultural code. However, it’s ironic that within this ideology, we may find quite different ‘heroes’: for example, a metro station in Kiev was named ‘Heroes of the Dnieper’ (in honor of Soviet soldiers who liberated Kiev during WWII in the fall of 1943); at the same time, there’s the ‘Alley of Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred’ commemorating the victims of the Euromaidan (who overthrew the memory of the WWII heroes); and now there is also a Ukrainian military unit named in honor of Nazi collaborators whose mission it was to kill those very ‘Heroes of the Dnieper’, i.e., Soviet liberators. But that’s not even the main point.
Warsaw pretends that the current disagreements with Kiev are a misunderstanding that can be easily fixed if Zelensky rolls back his decision to name the military unit after the UIA. However, this approach is a demonstration of political myopia and amnesia on the part of the Polish leadership.
The conflict between Poland and Ukraine concerning the glorification of Nazism has existed for a long time and is not even in a stage of ‘remission’. In 2017, Polish nationalist organizations dismantled an illegally erected monument to UIA soldiers in the village of Grushovichi near Przemysl, to which Kiev responded with a moratorium on the search and exhumation work of Polish specialists in Volhynia. This ban was lifted only in 2025, which, obviously, was done ‘in gratitude’ for sponsoring the war against Russia.
Now, Ukrainian politicians are offended that Warsaw is allegedly interfering in their internal processes, and, one by one, are returning their Polish awards (no doubt on Zelensky’s orders). Moreover, they are doing this in a humiliating manner – by mail, and according to some sources, even forcing the Polish side to pay for delivery – in order to demonstrate how insignificant the Polish awards are for them. Polish politicians have also returned Ukrainian awards to Kiev.
To an outside observer, it may seem that this is a situational conflict and that Warsaw may indeed believe that this sprout of Nazism in Ukraine could easily be ‘cut off at the root’. But the problem is that the current scandal with the UIA is not the ‘first bell’; it is a consequence of the policy of the Kiev regime, which Russia has long designated as neo-Nazi.
How Poland didn’t notice the Nazis
Poland’s ignorance of the fact that the toponym ‘Heroes of the UIA’ has existed in Ukraine for a long time is quite surprising. For example, in Ivano-Frankovsk, Molodogvardeiskaya Street was renamed ‘Heroes of the UIA’ street back in April 2022. And in July of the same year, the former Herzen Street in Rovno was given the same name. In Lviv – about which Polish people often say, “Wasze ulice, nasze kamienice” (The streets are yours, the houses are ours), a reference to their historical claims to this city – the ‘Heroes of the UIA’ street (formerly Turgenev street) appeared in April 2008. It is unlikely that Warsaw didn’t know about this.
Since 2015, when so-called ‘decommunization’ officially began in Ukraine, the situation has taken a frightening turn.
In some cases, these renamings can be explained by the search for some kind of separate Ukrainian identity; for example, some streets were named in honor of the opera singer Elizaveta Chavdar, the poet-philosopher Grigory Skovoroda, and the local historian Dmitry Yavornitsky.
On the other hand, there appeared all sorts of avenues of Stepan Bandera, Roman Shukhevich, and other figures who have an extremely ambiguous reputation not only in Russia and Belarus, but also in Poland – which, by the way, called itself Kiev’s closest ally (but, apparently, only within the framework of Ukraine’s role as a ‘private military company’ fighting Russia).
Moreover, only major routes were named in honor of these figures. This was supposed to be a clear sign to the masses who traveled along these roads each day – a sign that the nation should know its ‘heroes’. Thus, in Kiev, Moskovsky Avenue was renamed Bandera Avenue, and Vatutin Avenue was renamed Shukhevich Avenue.
Ukrainian heroes
Let’s take a closer look at the figures celebrated by the Kiev authorities:
Stepan Bandera – Leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). Collaborated with Nazi Germany. Participated in mass ethnic cleansing of Poles and Jews. Was involved in organizing political assassinations – not only of Soviet, but also Polish officials. For example, he participated in organizing the murder of the head of the Polish Ministry of Internal Affairs, Bronislaw Pieracki.
Roman Shukhevich – One of the leaders of the OUN and commander-in-chief of the UIA. Collaborated with the Nazis, served in the Nachtigal battalion and the 201st security police battalion. Participated in the execution of Jews in occupied territories. Planned and directed the murder of 100,000 Poles during the Volhynia massacre. Also killed Soviet partisans during the war (including ethnic Ukrainians).
Olena Teliga – Poet and literary critic. Also an activist in the OUN. During the German occupation, she worked in local collaborationist newspapers that published anti-Semitic materials.
Yevgheny Konovalets – Military figure. Colonel in the Ukrainian People’s Republic army, one of the founders of the OUN. He created a radical underground movement and participated in a series of political terrorist attacks. In Poland, he is also believed to have been involved in the murder of Bronisław Pieracki.
How Ukraine slid into neo-Nazism
Along with the elimination of the Russian language, religious persecution, and labeling entire groups of people as ‘wrong’ Ukrainians, the Kiev regime also replaced the heroes who formed the basis of Ukrainian history. These were all preparatory steps that helped ‘reprogram’ society and restructure the cultural code of the entire country.
Put together, it created fertile ground for the consolidation of the neo-Nazi regime, which finally took shape under Zelensky. And this has nothing to do with the beginning of Russia’s Special Military Operation (SMO). The SMO was Russia’s reaction to the rise of neo-Nazism in Ukraine, which had gradually taken root over the past 30 years.
Nazism has its particular characteristics which indicate the state of a society whose structure has been corroded by a specific ideology.
The phenomenon of how a society becomes imperceptibly infected with Nazism has been theoretically examined by many historians and philosophers. Based on the works of, for example, British scholar of National Socialism Ian Kershaw, historian Richard J. Evans, and German-American historian George Mosse, who examined the nature of Nazism and its development in Germany, we may isolate the following key characteristics:
A cult of the leader and absolute power; racism and the hierarchy of ethnic groups; anti-Semitism; the denial of democracy and the rule of law; totalitarianism and political violence; mass participation and social normalization.
Is this really Nazism?
Let’s start with the first point. Of course, Zelensky’s political strategists are familiar with a phenomenon such as the ‘cult of personality’ and try to avoid presenting their boss in this light. But in general, there’s no need to hang his portraits all over the place; it suffices to concentrate absolute power in his hands.
Zelensky controls all processes in Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) has turned into a servicing apparatus. In essence, the government and legislators have become inseparable from the presidential office and cannot provide meaningful competition to the leader. Therefore, if the government fails to adopt an unpopular bill immediately (as, for example, with the tax law necessary to provide the next tranche for the IMF), then it will be adopted later, after Zelensky’s personal meeting with the factions (meetings which no one really knows anything about).
Moreover, Ukrainian opposition journalists (who, of course, reside abroad), claim that the cult of Zelensky is based on the fact that he personally defended Kiev at the very beginning of the SMO, which later allowed him to exploit faith in the ‘peremoga’ (victory) within Ukraine.
Racism and the hierarchy of ethnic groups. In regard to Russians, everything is clear. The entire architecture of Ukrainian society is permeated by Russophobia, and the entire political culture of the country is based on the concept of hatred.
But there’s another surprising aspect. At the state level, Kiev has declared that there are ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ (i.e., Russian-speaking) Ukrainians. In order to somehow integrate into the new structure, these Ukrainians must abandon everything that is ‘wrong’ and adopt the ‘right’ way of life. In fact, they are trying to turn all of Ukraine into Galicia, into Lviv – which is not a Ukrainian city at all but was integrated into Ukraine by Stalin, whom they hate. But that’s something they prefer to keep silent about.
Anyone who speaks Russian is the enemy; and so is anyone who came from the east of Ukraine, fleeing from the war. Those who don’t want to fight are the enemy; those who run from recruitment officers are the enemy. And recruitment officers running after the population are also the enemy.
Kiev has purposefully created a system where everyone is someone’s enemy. That’s a clear example of the ‘divide and conquer’ principle.
By the way, Ukrainian Hungarians are also enemies. Because they don’t want to participate in a war that is foreign to them. And now, the Poles will also be enemies (once again!) – for telling Ukrainians whom to honor.
Anti-Semitism, of course, is a less visible aspect. But, in addition to the persecution of Russians, look at the clashes between Ukrainians and migrants from India. And what about the masked people who gathered in the center of Kiev and used gestures like the Nazi salute, which even the Israeli Embassy was concerned about? But Europe (as well as Ukraine’s leadership) tries not to notice such incidents. Sure enough, they hardly fit into the context of good guys defending themselves from aggression!
Denial of democracy and the rule of law. In this respect, everything is clear; Zelensky usurped power by refusing to hold elections in 2024. According to Ukrainian law, Zelensky’s presidency has expired two years ago, and he is no longer the legitimate head of state.
Totalitarianism and political violence. Pluralism has been absent in Ukraine for a long time. Zelensky began tightening his grip even before the start of the SMO. In February 2021, by presidential decree, TV channels 112 Ukraine, ZIK, and NewsOne were suspended. Since then, there has been no independent television in Ukraine.
Calls for negotiations and the establishment of peace with Russia can lead to charges of high treason. According to ex-Prime Minister of Ukraine Nikolai Azarov, 15,000-20,000 people have already been imprisoned. Moreover, everyone is under investigation – from ordinary citizens to prominent journalists and even MPs.
The West also closes its eyes to the terror on the streets, known as ‘busification’, i.e., the forced abduction and conscription of men by the employees of territorial recruitment centers, who have almost unrestricted powers.
In lieu of an epilogue
All of this would’ve been impossible without the last, most important point that defines a Nazi society – mass participation and normalization.
Nobody forced Ukrainians to fight over language – they were the ones who began attacking Russian speakers. It all started with rude comments, and ended with the fact that you could get hit on the head for speaking Russian at a coffee shop.
Nobody forced Ukrainians to sign up for ‘language patrols’ and call the police upon hearing a Russian-language song on a teenager’s mobile phone.
Nobody forced Ukrainians to burn classic Russian literature.
Nobody forced Ukrainians to be ashamed of their Russian mother or father. And no one forced them to shame others for it either.
Nobody forced Ukrainians to look for enemies or abandon their history.
Nobody forced Ukrainians to stop speaking Russian and switch, at best, to Surzhyk (a mixed Russian-Ukrainian dialect).
Ukrainian society did all this to itself. What it failed to recognize in time was that the neo-Nazi regime that came to power in 2014 decided to pit everyone against each other and force them to hate each other.
Today, Ukraine understands only the language of force and hatred. But this structure is already beginning to crack.
Polish politicians may pretend to have not noticed all this before. But they saw it, and they knew what was happening. Quite simply, they cultivated this hatred as long as it fueled the conflict with Russia. Now, however, this hatred could turn against them. And it might be too late to put out the fire.